Tuesday, April 4, 2017

A Doorway Opens in St Petersburg - Arch Symbolism

Terrorist attack in the St Petersburg Metro Station... through the arches
Being stuck at home sick with the flu again I had more time to catch up with the news and live broadcasts. Watching the terrible events in St Petersburg, Russia on April 3rd, I couldn’t help but be drawn in to the fear and dread that played out over and over in repeated video clips of the moments straight after the explosion on the metro.

The sounds of screaming, and off-camera shrieks of panic, and translations of ‘Oh my God!’ were simply heartbreaking. Watching the blood soaked people being dragged along the platform, and others scrambling through crushed, broken windows before collapsing to the floor. Truly horrific.

Looking at the aftermath photos of the striking St Petersburg Metro construction courtesy of RT news channel, I felt compelled to learn more about the place. Here is a sample of what I’ve come across.
Posiedon at the Metro?
Beautiful reliefs and art throughout the Metro and Museum

Symbolism of a high order in the Metro?

The symbolism of one post-terror attack picture stands out. It’s the arches of the subway station with the halted carriage and bomb wrecked doors and windows. Early pics have the bloodied people, body parts, and rescuers. The latest palatable ones show the cordoned off area of these arches.

There is some interesting stuff on the symbolism of the Arch from http://imagesinthemind.blogspot.co.uk/2008/07/arch-symbol.html and also http://www.ssje.org/symbols.html which you might find interesting… I’ve reposted here in brief…

Arches are structures with deep spiritual and psychic resonance.  They embody and symbolize many things: strength and support, lightness and openness within density, a beginning and an end.  Arches are entry points into liminal space.  In mythology, arches or doorways are understood as thresholds in time and space (chronos, the temporal world) through which one passes to enter another kind of time and space (kairos, the spiritual world).  Arches are iconic: while grounded in the present, they draw one’s gaze upwards to a higher ideal or tran¬scendent reality.  In the New Testament, the arch is also a fundamentally Johannine symbol.  In John’s gospel we hear Jesus saying, “I am the way,” “I am the doorway to the sheepfold.”

We find the arch a strong and inspiring image, yet the arch is also a paradoxical image which is built on weakness.  Many centuries ago Leonardo da Vinci wrote that “an arch is nothing else than a strength caused by two weaknesses; for the arch in buildings is made up of two segments of a circle, and each of these segments being in itself very weak desires to fall, and as one withstands the downfall of the other, the two weaknesses are converted into a single strength.”

So, what does an arch stand for in symbolism? Let’s decipher it, shall we… look at the images – doesn’t the arch remind you of something – like a gate or a doorway? Well, that is exactly what it symbolizes. An arch is a gateway – a door to something beyond it – a passageway to something more to follow….which is why their use in bridges today is interesting! - Because with a bridge you can walk through the door and reach the other side.

Arches appear on Tarot cards as well – and consequently, each of these cards has a significant aspect of transition within their meaning as well.

It is easy to see how, on a deep psychological level, arches can signify a period of transition – a passage from where one moves to another place. Transitions signify change – and the arch represents the passageways or doorways of that process. The process can be inner or outer – that is, something within could be changing (perhaps the personality, the vision, the perspective) or the change could be in the outer world aspect of life (perhaps profession change, appearance change, change in residence). Or, the process can be happening on both levels.

Has some kind of doorway been blown open now?

St Petersburg Metro Symbol.... esoteric...

Thursday, March 23, 2017

Is this Advance Knowledge of the UK Terror Attack?

Front page of the Daily Mail 22.3.17 
On 22nd March 2017  UK citizens became the latest unwitting participants, or rather targets, of a Gladio style false flag operation. It was not a hoax as some researchers are suggesting, but a planned event, with real victims and genuine witnesses.

The ordinary members of government and their staff, as well as the general public, and tourists, have already been primed for a terror attack. Even the Daily Mail newspaper chose an interesting front cover to ‘celebrate’ the life of Martin McGuinness (of IRA fame) in the morning.

Now all it took was timing, and of course, the sync date/numbers of… 3 22 17 … or 22 3 17, as we use in the UK.

Why am I backing a False Flag explanation, as opposed to a hoax? Simply put, I work within local government and I have subtle, speculative, circumstantial evidence. It may not convince some, but it proves to me and a few others, that, when it comes to instinct, nothing beats your first impressions.

Seven days before the Westminster false flag, I received my usual weekly newsletter. This newsletter “The Knowledge” is always full of local news, office updates, messages from the CEO, charity events, government spending, election results, and employment bulletins. Rarely Police notices on terrorism.

Yet, on Wednesday 15th 2017, in issue number 433, a two-page spread alerted staff to be vigilant’ (see photo). Me and my conspiratorial mind, how do you think I reacted? Well, immediately I thought how odd for the Police to issue such an out-of-context warning in our local newsletter, is something about to happen?

Who would target us here? We live and work out in the sticks of rural southern England.

Hold the front page… A fact I’ve overlooked, that we have a whole entire floor in the building dedicated to use by Westminster employees, straight out of London. Again, I thought it odd, but with the terror threat level so high in the UK maybe it’s warranted.

I put the newsletter away and forgot about it.

Yesterday afternoon, when my phone pinged with a SKY Breaking News alert, imagine my surprise… and disbelief. No way! I said to myself. Is there really a terrorist attack outside of Parliament? Wait a minute, wasn’t there something in the latest newsletter about a terror risk?

What a very strange and ominous co-incidence – and you know how I feel about coincidences…

Screen capture of the alert received last week

Wiki Definition – False Flag

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colours; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy's strategy of tension.

Thursday, January 12, 2017


Great sync of President Elect Donald J Trump flying past the Twin Towers as the narrator says, if in power, Trump will negotiate nuclear disarmament with Russia! (circa 1987)

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

TMZ Holds the Key - FL Fort Lauderdale Hollywood Airport - SHOOTOUT!

Shooter Esteban Santiago allegedly is just a mad man
What if a shooting is really a ‘shoot-out’?

Here I propose an alternative scenario to what the media is reporting regarding the latest lone gunman attack.

After viewing the TMZ footage, it’s clear to see that the original video is a play-back recording which was filmed off a tv screen, so obscuring the full picture (literally). There is even a light reflection from the tv screen on it! One victim is clearly seen as being blurred out of the image near the end of the footage at the bottom of the screen (so as not to be identified – could be TMZ doctoring). Therefore, this is clearly NOT original CCTV footage.

The shooter is seen moving with the rest of the passengers in the middle of the baggage retrievals area when suddenly he pulls a gun from his waist-band and clearly only targets persons to his right. (He is not ‘randomly shooting) Shots can be seen as he moves quickly forwards, then lowers his gun for a split second, seems to flinch, moves back then forwards, before raising and shooting again, then running forward, out of view. All of this in very quick succession.

Passengers behind the shooter can be seen to recoil at the gun shots, they naturally react in shock, some moving for cover to the right of screen, some unsure what is happening, while others diving to the floor on the left of screen, some distance away. In the background people appear from a staircase/escalator but turn back, and some run back up the stairs.

The aftermath footage that has been widely circulated shows bloodied victims on the opposite side to the direction that the shooter targeted. This can only mean one thing… did someone fire back?

With every false-flag, there are always two or more events happening simultaneously – or rather they ‘appear’ to be happening at the same time. False-flag events in my opinion are always misinterpreted, they are designed to shield a real-time event, they are not the event itself. This explains the constant contradictions. With FL Fort Lauderdale Hollywood International Airport this can be clearly seen. The TMZ video offers us proof.

The shooting/shootout takes only a few moments, let’s say minutes. Yet the ‘incident’ is reported as ‘active’. We know this is not the case, as the shooter is supposed to have dropped his gun in the lounge, then knelt down ( in some reports its said he lay spread-eagled on the floor of the lounge WAITING for law enforcement to apprehend him!) There are widely circulated photos of his arrest.

Clearly, not much time has elapsed. Yet, outside, for TV news cameras in helicopters to view, there is an ‘on-going’ long-running incident.

People are milling-around the runways freely, others are just standing around in the forecourt, in the car park, on staircases, people are running across runways while planes in the background are still taxiing and there are first responders arriving and cops are running around with rifles pointed to the terminal buildings and car parks. People appear to be stretchered off from an external direction, while a man with bloodied arm is being helped by the fence, note that this is outside of the terminal building.

The roads and fly-over in the background of all of this can be seen backed up with stopped traffic. All of this activity lasts for over an hour, but we know that the shooter is already in custody and has been classed as a ‘lone gunman’. He was in the first five minutes of the incident. The Police tell media that it is not a multiple shooter incident, yet eye-witnesses continue to say they hear shots fired, or they see shooting through windows of the terminal (some report terminal 1 not 2).

Early news footage has witnesses reporting that Police stop a white car on the entrance road to the airport, create a makeshift roadblock and then appear to arrest and handcuff the driver. Who is this man?

Today media report that law enforcement say the shooter had no specific reason for coming to Fort Lauderdale airport, that he chose it randomly. Of course, there is no evidence for this either way.

They also report that there is no apparent motive for the shooting, therefore it continues to be just some ex-soldier with mental health issues that decided to shoot people at random in the baggage claim. Again, the TMZ video shows that this is not exactly the case. The startling contradiction to what happens inside the terminal to the events unfolding outside are clues that manipulation of the truth of the event.

Let’s turn to the victims. Who was killed? Is there a really a ‘target’ victim, or is it just innocent grandmothers and retirees on holiday? Let’s use trusted CNN for this information:

More info can be found here: 

One thing stands out when reading about who the victims were...It's not the Norfolk Navy Shipyard and US Navy, or the pioneering work in Computers/IT done by Tech company CommScope bur rather... What do Radiation Control Technicians do?

The heroes during a terrifying and uncertain radiation crisis are those brave Scientists in the thick of the disaster at the nuclear plant, determining exactly how bad the radiation threat is and how to contain it. These heroes are called Radiation Control Technicians. In this job, the Radiation Control Technician needs to understand the mechanics of nuclear equipment, and is in charge of upkeep and service on these vital, but dangerous, energy generators.

A typical day in the life of a Radiation Control Technician entails processing shipments, testing levels of radiation through sampling, keeping detailed records for safety purposes, and monitoring the safety practices of other workers in the lab or plant. If you’re interested in traveling, this job could take you around the world as an expert in nuclear plants. If you’re simply a Scientist, the safety of a local research lab is in your hands. Either way, no lab or plant can legally function without the expertise of a Radiation Control Technician.